“A vaccine passport will lead to a two-tier society and is not necessary,” says PPC candidate
Editor’s Note: Ahead of the September 20 federal election, BradfordToday contacted all York-Simcoe constituency candidates with five questions related to the local opioid crisis, COVID-19 vaccine passports, Commission recommendations of truth and reconciliation, climate change, and affordable housing. The following responses were received from PPC candidate Michael Lotter. You can find more questions and answers about the candidates on our Canada Votes 2021 page.
************************************************** ****** **************************
1. In recent years, Barrie and Simcoe have experienced a devastating drug crisis, one of the worst in the province. How do you think the opioid problem should be approached and what is your position on the supervised consumption site (SCS) offered here in the city?
Drug use will occur with or without a safe consumption site. I believe that drug users need help, whether it is to end their drug addiction or to be safe while using. I am all for giving people the help they need, and this site, properly supervised and protected, is a step in that direction. More education must be available from an early age when drugs are involved. We cannot turn a blind eye as a community, or shame the people who have been the victims of their addiction. We must stand up together and help fight it. We need to determine the root cause and invest in correcting it to prevent new addictions while helping those in need.
Those who sell drugs face tougher penalties for their crimes, and our porous border where drugs enter the country must be strengthened!
2. As we prepare for a fourth wave of COVID-19 and a more aggressive delta variant, many suggest that Canada should adopt a vaccine passport. What is your take on this?
A vaccination passport will lead to a two-tier society and is not necessary. What about those who cannot get vaccinated due to side effects from previous vaccines, other health issues? Some religious groups cannot stand it for religious reasons. Are we now going to tell people that the freedom to follow your religious beliefs is no longer valid? Do they simply not have the opportunity to participate in society, avoided through no fault of their own?
The question we need to ask ourselves is this: If these vaccines the government has purchased are as safe and effective as has been said over and over again, those who are vaccinated should not be afraid of the unvaccinated.
If the vaccines work as expected a passport is not needed because you are protected, if they do not work a passport is not needed because no one is protected. I’m not an “anti-vaxxer” I’m talking about a person’s freedom to choose what is injected into their body and their right to privacy in that regard.
3. We are a rich country in many ways, but many indigenous reserves still do not have clean drinking water. The residential school tragedy tore apart the hurt and trauma that many of our Indigenous families have felt for generations. Many recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission go unheeded. How would you approach these issues and help heal these wounds?
Canadian history certainly has its negative points, and the loss of a child must truly be one of the most difficult things for the community to experience. Successive and continuing governments have done little or nothing to deal with the fallout from an ill-conceived plan to call the indigenous population “educate”.
I wish I could go back and save all the children who have suffered needlessly in this process, but we have to honor them in their traditional way, not smear their memories with photo opportunities. We must immediately seek out those who have been complicit in this and hold them accountable. Based on previous court rulings, established compensation has been determined for these atrocities, however, the government continues to fight in court not to retaliate. It has to be done and dealt with for the healing to begin. Taking it to court only fuels feelings of anger and loss instead of allowing the healing process between individuals and for families.
4. Recently, a major scientific report warned of increasingly extreme heatwaves, droughts and floods, as well as exceeding a key temperature limit in just over a decade. Scientists say it’s a “code red for humanity”. In what concrete ways will your party tackle climate change in the short and long term?
While no one can deny that the earth is in a warming cycle, scientifically accepted by experts in the field, none of the models have been able to accurately predict the future since the 1970s.
Even Michael E. Mann, author of the famous “hockey stick graph” agrees with the cyclical nature of the warming and cooling periods of the earth.
We believe that good environmental stewardship, prioritizing clean air, water and soil for Canada is a good short-term goal, including bringing clean drinking water to First Nations. Distant Nations.
We will withdraw from the Paris agreement because it only serves to keep greenhouse gas emissions targets unrealistic. Canada produces less than two percent of the world’s CO2 and some experts have agreed that a net zero carbon footprint would do nothing to change global CO2 levels as some countries continue to increase their emission levels.
Instead, in the long run, we will stop subsidizing inefficient green technologies and open up the market to private actors to create viable long-term solutions.
The carbon tax does not clean our atmosphere of greenhouse gases. We will abolish this tax and let the provinces come up with reasonable solutions for their jurisdictions.
5. Housing is a human right, but many people in the region cannot afford a roof over their heads. The cost of living continues to rise as the price of housing and rents skyrocket far beyond affordability for the average person. What would your party do to fix this problem?
The age-old question of supply and demand. At first glance, a case of economic advantage for homeowners over those who want to enter the housing market, if you want you will pay what is asked and more.
Canada simply does not have enough completed housing units per year (about 280,000) to support the number of people leaving the homes of their parents, new students or new immigrants. Immigration represents 300,000 to 350,000 people per year looking for accommodation (in perspective it is 10 times the population of Bradford). Through no fault of their own, immigrants, students and young adults leaving their parents’ homes for the first time are fighting for housing, and each outbid the other. This artificially increases the value of a house.
Inflation is one of the other important factors in housing. As the Bank of Canada prints more money, your paycheck is devalued and therefore your purchasing power is reduced. The value of the landlord’s rent is decreased and therefore has to increase the rent to meet his needs / wants. After all, an owner is in business to make money.
A first step will be to use the federal mandate with the Bank of Canada to set an inflation target of 0%. This will maintain the purchasing power of a paycheck, saving more money for homeownership, or keep the price of rent under control, as landlords maintain the value of money paid. in rent. In Ontario, there is already a rule preventing rent increases by more than a certain percentage. A sustainable immigration policy reflecting our economic needs should be considered to ease the pressure on available housing, preventing offers to buy that artificially inflate home values.